Benedict Allen : Inside Story
“My attitude has been that readers or viewers should
be free to take what they can – if anything! – from whatever I’ve
produced without me interfering by trying to explain or justify. Over the years
I’ve given very little explanation even of the earliest four books, which
I don’t see as from any conventional mould – nor of my personal motivation
for doing all these lone, madcap ventures beyond the glib and all-too easy “because
it’s there” type answers. But now, twenty-five years from when I
set out, and the last major expedition a few years ago, it might be time to offer
up more. Personally, I think most of us spend too long dwelling on ourselves,
and I’ve been sickeningly self-indulgent already in even having a website!
But as I do frequently get asked what really makes me tick, I’ll try to
be as open and frank as possible here and hope these thoughts are of some interest
- and even of some use to others setting out on their own path.
“First some background: with a father who was a pilot, an older cousin
serving in the Ghurkhas, another the distinguished writer on India Charles Allen,
my childhood was steeped in tales of exciting, exotic lands. I began to fill
my bedroom shelves with things my dad brought back for me - African weaverbird
nests, fossils, even a stuffed baby crocodile and a snake preserved in a bottle
of meths. So, not surprising that I felt intrigued by the wider world - but neither
my brother nor sister were interested in travel and nor was it actually travelling
that I was interested in. I was perhaps an unusual child: a bit of a dreamer,
a bit confused I daresay – nothing unusual in this, but I seemed to be
by nature fearsomely independent, always looking for my own solutions. What’s
more, I seemed to lack something: I felt I wasn’t feeling life as much
as others - or maybe I should say I didn’t seem able to appreciate life
simply as it was. I found myself wanting to hurl myself at the world, get to
grips with it. So, sad to say, my primary impulse to head off into the wilds
was only partially to do with pleasure or curiosity: my main desire was just
to try and make head or tail of the world - and venturing to the far corners
and writing about it seemed the obvious way in which to process my thoughts.
I became more and more certain that this was what I was going to do. This was
my destiny, I thought: and importantly, my relatives had shown me that a life
of adventure was indeed possible.
“After school, I headed to the university [University of East Anglia]
which had, I felt, perhaps the best degree in the world-at-large. But by the
final year, this strange inner compulsion to launch myself off into Nowhere was
almost un-containable: rather than concentrating on my Finals, I joined two expeditions,
and led a third. The university banned me from a fourth – and perhaps just
as well.
“However, a problem had begun to emerge: how to carry out my expeditions
without any money? My parents didn’t have any – the private school
I’d been to, Bradfield [College], had been paid for out of their savings,
topped up by my grandmother. “There followed a year [at the University
of Aberdeen] studying for an MSc. degree in Ecology, though to be honest my mind
wasn’t on it. (Perhaps I should mention right here that when my mind is
on something, it’s TOTALLY on it – everything else in the world is
eclipsed. I must be one of only a handful of people to have been awarded very
gratifying 100% at one university for the undergraduate thesis, and very distinct
zero at the next). I was pre-occupied with how to bring about my first independent
journey. Furthermore, it seemed to me that now - at what was the tail end of
the era of exploration and the beginning of the era of mass tourism - journeys
to the far North Pole or across Borneo or anywhere else weren’t actually
journeys of discovery any more. They weren’t necessary. Physical frontiers
were being advanced only by the scientists – one of which I was not. So
if this possibly self-destructive compulsion of mine was going to be of any use
to anyone – and I had the good sense to know that I needed a perfectly
clear vision of what I was going to be doing, and be able to justify it or else
I’d fall apart along the way - it would have to be through my writing.
Exploration is a mental, not just physical process – and the world will
always need interpreting afresh, just as Livingstone explored central Africa
(already actually quite well explored by the Arabs) for the Victorian world.
And so there evolved a scheme to cross from the mouth of the Orinoco to the mouth
of the Amazon, which would take me through what was, I thought, the least known
terrain on our planet - and be the perfect context for the first of what I planned
to be a quartet of books on the themes arising from remote terrain and our human
impulse to explore it.
“But there remained the practical question: how to pull off what was
(judged by any normal expedition criteria) a ridiculously hard journey, AND when
I didn’t have any money. As I’ve just said, the venture had no scientific
purpose – indeed, no useful wider purpose whatsoever (other than whatever
uncertain new insights into man and nature that my books might provide) - and
wasn’t going to attract sponsorship. Then it struck me that the locals
didn’t have any money either! So, what I should do, I decided, was go alone
and learn some of the indigenous peoples’ skills: in a sense, they’d
become my sponsors.
“I worked in a nearby warehouse [sorting books for the bookshop chain
Hammick’s,] to raise funds for at least a return flight, and lived with
my dear, long-suffering mother and father in Alton [Hampshire, Southern England].
It was something I was to continue to do, in order to earn money between successive
expeditions, until the age of twenty seven! Looking back now, I see how hard
it must have been for them. I mean, they were helping sustain their youngest
son’s passion – or obsession – for heading year upon year into
terrain that he was ill-equipped to cope in, even when that passion had already
come close to killing him. What a selfless thing they did for me; who could ask
for more of a parent?
“People sometimes ask whether I didn’t have doubts, during these
years, about my future – after all, by the age of thirty I still didn’t
have what my mum fondly called a Proper Job – and I’d like to say
a bit about this because I know there are lots of people who are like I was back
then and have an idea of something they want to do, but are discouraged by the
worst sort of teachers, role-models, career advisors or parents. Yes, you bet
I had doubts! 12 years went by before I was making anything like a living. It
was easy for me in one sense, though: I was driven. I couldn’t see any
other choice. But of course if you are doing anything out of the ordinary then
there’ll be those who’ll criticize or attack you, sometimes out of
professional jealousy, sometimes from the best of motives – and I certainly
was attacked back then. It was hard to take both because my parents had suffered
so much, worrying for me while I was away doing these things, and because I had
more experience of lone rainforest travel than just about anyone. This was a
quarter of a century ago now, and I was an unknown upstart who’d apparently
pulled off a colossal physical feat – and in record-breaking time - and
then didn’t bother to explain or document it. So, maybe I was asking for
trouble. In time, though, my track record did begin to speak for itself, and
the self-filmed expeditions also helped show the integrity with which I like
to think I approach my work. Looking back I can understand just how irritating
my “daring exploits” must have been – and perhaps are - to
many people. Sometimes no doubt I haven’t been vigilant enough with facts – and
this becomes complicated further by journalists and TV producers, who tend to
exaggerate, or at least make the most of, whatever stories I do have to tell.
Besides, we “adventurers” get far too much attention. I think the
likes of me – mountaineers, polar athletes, desert-trekkers and others
doing treks today - should not be regarded as heroic for these feats. Self-indulgent
and narcissistic perhaps, but not heroic! Now, my grandfather was blown up in
the First World War while trying to rescue a wounded soldier from No Man’s
Land: he was a hero.
But this is all by-the-by. All I’m saying is that you have to expect
criticism if you are attempting to achieve something new, and thus are deliberately
putting your head above the parapet – afterall, this ordnance flying at
you isn’t going to kill. This is just the nature of things, and best just
to keep believing in yourself, keep that clear vision of where you are going,
and let your endeavours and good character speak for themselves in time. It IS
vital to listen to the criticism of those who do actually know your faults, because
there ARE bound to be many. There certainly were, and are, in my case. But that’s
enough on all this.
“Until well into my thirties, then, even though I had left home, I was
dependent on kind-hearted people who let me sleep in their spare rooms or sofa-beds
for little or no rent. But sorry, I need to go back a bit: I’d noticed
as a schoolboy that I was different – or thought I was. And I suppose every
child feels they are. But three things helped me believe I was unusual, and therefore
might succeed despite everything: first, I had my crystal clear idea of how my
future would be – specifically, I could envisage the quartet of books that
would one day result from my first journeys. Second, like my test pilot dad,
I was calm in a crisis yet had unusually fast reactions – this became something
of a running joke at school, where one or two other pupils would spring tests
on me. Thirdly, I had an extraordinary tunnel vision at times – I’ve
mentioned already how I got the highest possible marks for a university thesis,
and totally blew the next. There’s an otherworldliness about me which hasn’t
left to this day – I know I come over to many people as someone unbelievably
absent-minded, or vague. My mind is elsewhere – but as long as “elsewhere” is
the right place, this helps me zone in on an objective, switch off distractions
and sensations from around me. For example, at these times (and this of course
can also be dangerous) I’m hardly conscious of cold or pain – or
notice very much about anything else. But I don’t want to make a meal of
this : I just want to say that I think this sense of being special made me feel
that my early expeditions, though ludicrously ambitious, might in my case actually
be achievable. I had the great advantage of believing that the normal rules didn’t
apply in my case – helped by copious naivety.
“For a start, it was a ludicrously naïve notion to think I could
just turn up, hope for hospitality, and that I might somehow acquire skills that
indigenous people had acquired over generations. I did have the good sense to
know that it would be wrong to risk someone else on any of my ventures, thank
goodness. But, as it turned out, this innocence didn’t kill me – actually,
I think it was what kept me alive on that first journey. No one saw me as a threat:
rather, I was seen as vulnerable, and I was handed, like a parcel, through the
forest by various wonderful people (who didn’t want me to die on their
hands, perhaps!). It did go wrong at the end – when I had to walk about
65 miles out of the forest (east of the Jari river), and suddenly found myself
facing the reality of the Amazon without assistance. This was when there was
all that business of having to eat the dog. But too much has been made of that – it
wasn’t a pet, and to be absolutely frank I’m really not sure I could
respect someone who wouldn’t do such a thing, indeed anything at all, in
order to live to see his or her loved ones again.
“None-the-less, the general expedition methodology worked – after
a fashion. And although I can see now that I was a danger to everyone who helped
me, I could at least see that I had begun to learn. This formula that I’d
developed out of necessity now became my modus operandi.
“It was back to the warehouse whilst I wrote the first book [Mad White
Giant] of the quartet and, before publication, headed off on the second expedition.
I didn’t want to return to the Amazon for a while – it might seem
glamorous, reading about it, but in truth I’d had miserable and frightening
times there – and pitched myself into Irian Jaya, the only other region
of the planet where there were un-acculturated Rain Forest people. Eventually,
I ended up in the Sepik [next door, in PNG]. This was a less physically remote
place – but where cultural practices were still remote from our understanding.
But what sort of person in their right mind would voluntarily go through a ceremony
in which you are physically scarred and beaten for weeks? The answer is, someone
who’s been emotionally scarred – you can just imagine what turmoil
my mind was in, after having been alone for weeks struggling for my life in the
Amazon. And all these years on, I can’t help but notice that all the journeys
since have repeated a pattern - I’ve been re-living the experience of the
first journey, as people who’ve undergone extreme trauma do. I seem to
have been condemned, in a way that Buddhists might understand, to repeat my life
until I’d got it right – Ground Hog Day.
This process only seemed to end on my last big trek, when I went to the Arctic
[Russian Far East] , and almost died again – along with my dog team. In
the event, I turned back from my objective, to cross the Bering Strait, somewhere
approximately midway (I believe) out there. I’d decided to get the dogs
safely home. Was this redemption? Ten dog lives brought back safely, after my
loss of one in the Amazon? I really don’t know – and though I’ve
gone on and on about myself, sharing my private thoughts here, actually none
of these matters I’m used to discussing. My strict rule is not to ponder
my motives or what others think of my work; I’d have lost my vision of
where I’m going - or my sanity - years ago, otherwise. My close friends
and family all know not to question me about these things – they only ever
meet a wall, if they do. But I must confess that since my safe return from the
Arctic I don’t have that same, turbulent compulsion – and haven’t
physically pushed myself to the limit in the years since. There just remains
the original, troubled schoolchild’s compulsion to understand the world – and
any creative person has the much the same, don’t you think?
“Finally, a short word on how my writing progressed: At last, the intended
quartet was written – they were not travelogues, the traditional personalized,
eye-witness account of a journey, but four books written according to four different
moods, and each reflecting the pre-occupations and perceptions of a young person
as he or she goes about his/her journey into a faraway world. Obviously they
are meant to give insight into the physical locations as well but my main interest
was that together the four books might combine the themes of journeying into
the unfamiliar – Homer’s The Odyssey, but rooted in very real experience.
“Maybe one day I’ll try my hand at trying to piece together the
journeys – in particular that first Orinoco- Amazon journey - in a more
considered way, with references to other writers, to scientists, and enriched
with all manner of thoughtful observations in the way of other travelogues. But,
as I said earlier, the era of geographical exploration was coming to a close
and, with all the arrogance of someone still in their early twenties I was adamant
that I must forge something new. I’d read about a classical composer – someone
I now take to have been Brahms. He’d wondered what he could ever achieve
with his music – Beethoven had already done everything! He’d reached
all the heights. So he decided he must look sideways instead. And appearing on
the scene long after the likes of Burton, Speke and Stanley, I thought I must
do the same. The answer was to go about doing the last great land journeys – and
explore the experience of doing them, the themes thrown up by each journey rather
than detail the actual place I passed through. After all, there were botanists,
zoologists, anthropologists and other scientists far better equipped than me
to record the people and terrain. In some books more than others, it meant relegating
reasoned observation – and in the most extreme case, Mad White Giant, the “firey” book,
this was flagged up by the use of pastiche and satire in cartoon-like sketches.
But it would be wrong to say that this book distorted or exaggerated the difficulties
or course of that first journey, which – modesty aside! - I think rather
a good physical achievement.
“The next, fifth, book (Through Jaguar Eyes) was designed to be a more “complete” and
balanced account – an amalgam of the four styles/moods, but still interested
more in the perception of the traveller, the act of journeying rather than the
conveying of the geographical, historical or other texture of the land encountered.
“There followed simple diary accounts of my journeys - the “twin
books” Skeleton Coast and Edge of Blue Heaven – then Last of the
Medicine Men, a fairly uncomplicated overview of my experiences looking at healers
around the world, again for the TV. It seemed fitting that my tenth book would
feature a trek through the Arctic during which my fate would hang on the fate
of the canine species - as it had on my first.
“Of course, taking a video camera along by now had given an extra dimension
to the accurate recording of the journey. By the way – and I’m not
sure I’ve said this before - it was Anita Roddick (of Bodyshop) who paid
for my first video camera. She’d once said to me that if there was anything
she could do to further my work, be sure to let her know. When I wrote one day
to her saying the BBC had kindly asked me to record my forthcoming Amazon journey – but
hadn’t given me any money for it! – she sent a personal cheque by
return of post. What an extraordinary person... And that’s how my first
telly programme, and (for better and often for worse!) a new TV genre came about.”
|